A3 Modeling Lowers Cost of Enterprise Budgeting… Again!

… and still the best kept secret in Business Intelligence?

 Apparently so! With this current release of A3 Modeling, version 2011.1 there is no highly anticipated marketing “Launch”, no public celebration, no popping corks on Champaign bottles. Just another maintenance release intended to further drive down the cost of enterprise budgeting and corporate performance management.

For now, that’s how A3 rolls, quietly leveraging our recent string of competitive wins into very happy customers by delivering more than functionality, flexibility, and ease of use than our rivals at significantly lower total cost.

But this is not your typical maintenance release, with a few bug fixes and some cosmetic improvements. Take a look at some of the enhancements:

New Feature Enhancements
* Automated Allocations, Eliminations, Journal Entries, and Calculations – tokenized, configurable, sequenceable, now available for Analysis Services
* Microsoft Sharepoint Integration – including single sign-on
* Peer-to-peer Dashboard sharing
* Enhanced Relational Database Connectivity – code-free and configurable.
* Mobile Tablet Support

New Preconfigured Solutions
* Balance Sheet Roll Forward
* Capital Project Modeling and Prioritization

Like I said, we’re on a roll. Check it out…

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Big Vendor Risk: Why the Smaller Independent CPM Vendor Can Often Be the *Lower Risk* Choice

In Which Our Daring Cavalier Explains His Advantages, Even Against Enemies Larger and Stronger than He

Fear. Uncertainty. Doubt. The ability to paint a picture of risk in working with the smaller vendor is the stock-in-trade of every enterprise salesperson. For as long as upstart entrepreneurs have been so bold as to take on industry leaders, we have had to defend ourselves against F.U.D.    Read More About Big Vendor Risk…

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Which CPM Solution is Best for You? “Best Practices Package” vs. “Flexible Modeling Application”

In Which Our Knight Errant Explores the Two Primary CPM Solution Types

Certainly the out-of-the-box, plug & play package that is up and running in minutes must be lower total cost than the flexible and highly configurable alternatives. All of the decisions and expertise required to install the more sophisticated solution… they all add up to more dollar$! Right? Not so fast!

When mired in the pain and inefficiency of manual spreadsheets or inflexible custom-coded solutions, customers might be wowed by the promises of a Best Practices Package to transform their process and alleviate their pain instantly, out-of-the-box.

Beware! The simple, brain-dead, easy-to-use, big-button user interface that in the sales demo appears to magically eliminate all of your problems comes at great – and hidden – compromise in features and flexibility. This compromise becomes apparent only during rigorous prototyping, or after purchase and during deployment, when it’s too late to take corrective action.

But Flexibility Equals High Cost – Doesn’t It?

No! On the contrary! (aside: Why is it folks seem to equate flexibility with cost?)

EXAMPLE: Take A3 Modeling, whose ability to model your business in detail the way you run your business is, paradoxically, why its deployment cost is so low! Authoring in A3 Modeling is as flexible and intuitive as the Excel design process, and modifications are quick and intuitive. Also, A3 Modeling snaps onto any OLAP consolidation database without imposing design restrictions and without requiring you write code, so no time is lost working around limitations. This last issue cannot be over-emphasized. When big IT projects fail, often the culprit is a key requirement that forced the vendor to go under the covers and start re-writing their software.

(aside follow-up: Maybe the disconnect occurs because when folks hear the word “flexibility” they think “customization”, i.e., complex, technical programming…)

That the canned “out-of-the-box” solution is more expensive to deploy may seem counter-intuitive; however, in the real-world where modeling your P&L, Balance Sheet and Inventory Turns is anything but a  generic push-button exercise, the first thing you find with these products is the user interface cannot model the business rules and dimensions that are key to managing your business. So how are these needs addressed? This is not a happy situation. Either a) you pay for costly workarounds, b) you fund vendor customizations; or worst of all, c) you are forced back into spreadsheets!

BOTTOM LINE ON CPM: Nobody has yet successfully “canned” the Corporate Performance Management process. So, until someone does, always look for a CPM solution that accommodates all nuances of your business process and financial logic – rather than a solution that force-fits you to its limitations.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

CPM, BPM, EPM … S.O.S!

Ouch! I just read more closely the Wikipedia article on Corporate Performance Management linked in my last post. Actually, there is no wiki-entry for CPM. CPM searches are redirected to Business Performance Management, aka BPM, and the piece is painful to read, poorly written! Even Wikipedia discredits its own article as containing weasel words and biased content.

I agree with Wikipedia. This article sounds like somebody’s marketing propaganda. See if you agree.

First of all, I sense (pre-Oracle) Hyperion bias. Take the wiki-reference to Howard Dresner. Why is he even mentioned in this article? With all due respect, Mr. Dresner gave up his claim to unbiased thought leadership in 2007 when he left Gartner to evangelize for Hyperion as a high paid CxO, Hyperion’s Chief Strategy Officer. While I grant him a role in differentiating Business Intelligence from Data Warehousing way back when, his influence on CPM was minor compared to others.

Henry Morris of IDC, for example, who coined Analytic Applications. As Morris defined them, these are the key analytic processes to 1) Set goals; 2) Monitor performance; 3) Analyze; 4) Course correct; and… 5) Repeat. Sound familiar? CPM in a nutshell! Morris chronicled the inception of the industry and stayed with it well into its hockey stick phase. If anyone deserves mention, it’s Morris!

A little more history… when the space got hot, Hyperion coined Business Performance Management and declared itself the leader. A magazine, BPM Magazine, and a consulting company, BPM Partners (an experienced, and IMO, unbiased team), got behind the acronym. As BPM picked up momentum, Oracle, in a very Oracle move, snubbed BPM altogether and declared itself the leader of an even higher order incarnation, EPM, Enterprise Performance Management!

Meanwhile, much of the rest of the industry, perhaps in reaction to the propaganda, gravitated to CPM, Corporate Performance Management. Gartner ultimately chose CPM and now publishes a Magic Quadrant.

[In a final twist of irony, when Oracle acquired Hyperion, all references to Hyperion's BPM past were purged.]

… and here we are, a jumble of acronyms, CPM, BPM, EPM. Confusion to the customer.

So why is A3 putting our energy behind CPM?

The short answer is that EPM and BPM have propaganda laden histories, and they each suggest a strong vendor bias. We want our customers to know we represent your interests and that we are not beholden to any industry behemoth. We hope you appreciate that we take the “I” in ISV very seriously.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Don Quixote, ROI, and Corporate Performance Management

What do CPM, ROI, and Don Quixote have in common?

Well, their meanings have been diluted, and the powerful ideas they stand for have been undermined and distorted. In addition, I am a passionate fan of all three, so for the foreseeable future, I commit these blog posts to exploring the ideals they represent and rediscovering their vibrancy and power.

But… Don Quixote?

Yes, one of my favorite literary figures… for his honor, chivalry, and selfless
courage in pursuit of the greater good. We have so much in common.

“But,” you ask, “wasn’t he a little… off? I mean, aren’t you admiring a crazy man?”

Oh, no, no. Don’t disrespect my boy Don. Here’s a man who dares to dream the impossible dream and, not so much out of choice but of calling to a higher purpose, risks everything to pursue it. If that’s the definition of crazy, then I am guilty of same… and this world needs more crazy!

After all, we share the same gene… the hallucinatory gene of the entrepreneur! As much as any other figure I’ve run across, Don Quixote embodies the entrepreneurial spirit… the courage,  the determination, the vulnerability.

So, I now welcome you to my blog, On CPM. By sharing, first hand, my experience from a front row seat in the industry, my hope is that your appreciation grows for the potential of CPM to transform your business, that you gain more insight into the value of ROI and practical techniques for calculating it, and that you are often entertained, and occasionally even inspired, by the off-beat and often contrarian truths of this admittedly quixotic entrepreneur.

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment